• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1013 days ago

    All it takes is reading the article to see why it was done. You clearly did not do that and instead inserted your own agenda.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -413 days ago

      I did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        613 days ago

        While he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -713 days ago

          He was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            813 days ago

            And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren’t troll farm accounts - the “various compliance requirements” are not just a US thing.

            If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by “news”, I don’t mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -213 days ago

              The “various comoliance requirements” are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.