• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    No, it was always “Ukraine is winning but might lose if we don’t help” because obviously if they just said “Ukraine is winning” then the help would be not needed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      013 days ago

      It was “Ukraine is on the verge of losing each second but a few weapons can keep their head above water until a peace is negotiated”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        613 days ago

        No it wasn’t, nobody official in Ukraine or west even talked about negotiating peace, the terms was always basically unconditional surrender of Russia and conquest of Crimea.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            212 days ago

            I mean they didn’t officially called Russia to surrender, but after the first talks were sabotaged by Johnson, official stance of Ukraine, supported by their western helpers was (and still is) that Russia should entirely left borders of Ukraine including Donbas and also give them Crimea. The only situation in which this could happen is Russia’s surrender (and historically such maximum one sided demands also only happened after surrendering of one side).