• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2022 days ago

    It looks pretty well cited to me. The fact that it was written anonymously doesn’t really take away from that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      322 days ago

      It really kind of does. If the author is so ashamed of the work that they won’t sign it, that speaks volumes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1522 days ago

        This would only really make sense if they were trying to throw around the weight of the authors, which they clearly are not. Who makes these points is irrelevant when it’s simply highlighting rms’ own words and linking to them directly. Why should I care who wrote it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        You can say that speaks volumes about the character of the author (though you are the one assigning said “shame”). You were asking why this report deserves credence. The points raised in the report have citations such that you can decide where you fall on the presented issues.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Ummm or the authors are concerned about retribution because stallman and the FSF are very powerful in the FOSS community, and I think it’s reasonably likely that they would be sued (seemingly with poor grounds) or harassed online for publishing it.